You are here

Home » Forums » General discussion

walcott or chamberlain or both?

mcbikeman's picture
Submitted by mcbikeman on Sun, 17/04/2016 - 06:19

Forums:

Both injury prone but both seem surplus to requirements at arsenal so would we want them? rumours are that we could be interested in chamberlain but so are Southampton..interesting months ahead and qualifying for Europe will no doubt attract better players but I guess we will wait and see just who bilic wants and who he wants shot of.

Nathan Redmond from Norwich, along with Gokhan Tore as already mentioned.
Jack Wilshire for midfield as well.

up
264 users have voted.
moore2come's picture

moore2come

Wed, 20/04/2016 - 01:06

Wilshere? What as company for Carroll in the treatment room. No thankyou! He wouldn't come anyway. His England career would be over!!

up
140 users have voted.

Both have been offered to us and today the redtops have confirmed Chamberlain via Arsenal and his agent. I see a lot of negative comments on here about him but last year he was flying and an England regular as well.
What Slaven has to do is assess the player over last year before his injury and make damn sure he is not going to be yet another one in the treatment room half the season if we take him on!!!
For me I would have said yes last season but before we take him on lets have a strong medical assessment and if there are any doubts say no!

up
197 users have voted.

A D Bonds

Next Fixture(s)