You are here

Chelsea vs West Ham Line-Ups

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Mon, 03/02/2025 - 18:47

Chelsea: Jorgensen, James, Tosin, Colwill, Cucurella, Caicedo, Fernandez, Madueke, Palmer, Sancho, Jackson Subs: Sanchez, Chalobah, Acheampong, Gusto, Dewsbury-Hall, George, Neto, Nkunku, Guiu.
West Ham: Areola, Wan-Bissaka, Kilman, Emerson, Coufal, Cresswell, Soler, Soucek, Irving, Bowen (C), Kudus Subs: Fabianski, Foderingham, Mavropanos, Guilherme, Ings, Rodriguez, Casey, Scarles, Orford

Share

Comments

mcbikeman's picture

Injured? glad to see Irving given a chance lets see how it goes COYI

up
13 users have voted.
boogerscaravan's picture

Glad Irving getting a run out "The Portobello Pirlo. Very underrated player. More mobile with him and Soler in there. Great to see Bowen back.

up
13 users have voted.

Up yer arse, up yer arse, stick yer blue flag up yer arse!!

That was a painful result. Potter's boys did not deserve that. Game turned on that dubious equaliser. A point was well deserved. Things are looking good. Next season can't come quick enough.

up
11 users have voted.
mcbikeman's picture

And Sullivan if you were watching just think what might of been had you had the balls to get shot of Loppy in November.....plenty of green shoots and a lot to build on COYI

up
13 users have voted.
boogerscaravan's picture

Really proud of us tonight. Players giving 110% for the manager. No passengers or freeloaders on show.

What a turnaround and how positive things now look. Two weeks now to really shape the team. Exciting times!!

up
14 users have voted.

Up yer arse, up yer arse, stick yer blue flag up yer arse!!

We had that match in our pocket ,it's the same shite ,we cand seem to maintain our momentum, we played a fine high press for all of the first half and better still in the second, you could almost see their opener when they started passing it arownd their back four looking for the chance to get in behind us , subs were dubious ,and I'm sick of the sight of uncle Ings coming on and chasing shadows with ten minuets to go .

up
13 users have voted.

Burkie 1

Deluded Hammer's picture

I thought Potters substitutions were wrong and upset the impetus we were having on the game. We were on the back foot after those subs and unfortunately THAT goal and didn't look threatening thereafter.. We bought on Ings and as far as I could see, he wasn't given the ball in the box once. The kids didn't improve anything either. Is it just me who thinks Irving looks about 40 by the way?

up
11 users have voted.
boogerscaravan's picture

I see it for what it was chaps. If we are splitting hairs I'll say it was the officiating that done for us. But as I've said in previous posts. VAR would go against us sooner rather than later. Definite foul on Bowen leading up to their goal. Play should have been halted straight away. The offside was debateable and for it to be scrutinised for that long. With inconclusive footage shows the games gone mad. We move on....!!

up
12 users have voted.

Up yer arse, up yer arse, stick yer blue flag up yer arse!!

Next Fixture(s)