Chelsea: Jorgensen, James, Tosin, Colwill, Cucurella, Caicedo, Fernandez, Madueke, Palmer, Sancho, Jackson Subs: Sanchez, Chalobah, Acheampong, Gusto, Dewsbury-Hall, George, Neto, Nkunku, Guiu.
West Ham: Areola, Wan-Bissaka, Kilman, Emerson, Coufal, Cresswell, Soler, Soucek, Irving, Bowen (C), Kudus Subs: Fabianski, Foderingham, Mavropanos, Guilherme, Ings, Rodriguez, Casey, Scarles, Orford
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3b1/6f3b10ec7c27ead993d2b8b9c25c77d28e5a74f6" alt="Share"
Comments
No Alvarez?
Injured? glad to see Irving given a chance lets see how it goes COYI
And where's Paky?
And where's Paky?
I suspect Potter
Is about to get a lesson in how to manage a football club with loadsa money
Glad Irving getting a run out
Glad Irving getting a run out "The Portobello Pirlo. Very underrated player. More mobile with him and Soler in there. Great to see Bowen back.
That was a painful result.
That was a painful result. Potter's boys did not deserve that. Game turned on that dubious equaliser. A point was well deserved. Things are looking good. Next season can't come quick enough.
Did not deserve that
And Sullivan if you were watching just think what might of been had you had the balls to get shot of Loppy in November.....plenty of green shoots and a lot to build on COYI
Really proud of us tonight.
Really proud of us tonight. Players giving 110% for the manager. No passengers or freeloaders on show.
What a turnaround and how positive things now look. Two weeks now to really shape the team. Exciting times!!
Can't agree with you boogers & bike We had that match in our
We had that match in our pocket ,it's the same shite ,we cand seem to maintain our momentum, we played a fine high press for all of the first half and better still in the second, you could almost see their opener when they started passing it arownd their back four looking for the chance to get in behind us , subs were dubious ,and I'm sick of the sight of uncle Ings coming on and chasing shadows with ten minuets to go .
Pretty much agree there Burkie
I thought Potters substitutions were wrong and upset the impetus we were having on the game. We were on the back foot after those subs and unfortunately THAT goal and didn't look threatening thereafter.. We bought on Ings and as far as I could see, he wasn't given the ball in the box once. The kids didn't improve anything either. Is it just me who thinks Irving looks about 40 by the way?
I see it for what it was
I see it for what it was chaps. If we are splitting hairs I'll say it was the officiating that done for us. But as I've said in previous posts. VAR would go against us sooner rather than later. Definite foul on Bowen leading up to their goal. Play should have been halted straight away. The offside was debateable and for it to be scrutinised for that long. With inconclusive footage shows the games gone mad. We move on....!!