You are here

Forum | General Discussion

Amazon To Show How It's Done-For Free!

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Wed, 03/06/2020 - 12:36

Having brought new ideas and cutting edge technology to their platform during their first forray in to broadcasting Barclays Premier League football, Amazon via Amazon Prime will make it's four Premier League games free to air when the season restarts. Surprisingly fans will not need a Prime membership to watch fixtures on the online streaming service when the top flight campaign resumes from the 17th of June, it is a sign of confidence from Amazon, as they feel that 'one off' viewers will want to join Amazon Prime as a result of watching the seamless delivery of games.

Every one of the remaining 92 Premier League games will be broadcast live across Sky Sports, BT Sport, BBC Sport or Amazon Prime. In total, 33 of those matches will be free to air, Sky Sports will make 25 of the remaining top flight matches free to air, including the Merseyside derby on the first weekend after the resumption which will be from the 19th to the 21st of June.

"Like the rest of the country, we are excited to see the Premier League return to action, we will be making all four of Amazon Prime Video's additional fixtures in the 2019-20 season available free of charge; fans will not need a Prime membership to view the games on Prime Video." Alex Green, managing director of Prime Video Sport Europe was quoted as saying.

In May, it was announced that four Premier League games will be broadcast, free to air, live on BBC Sport when the season resumes,which will be the first time the BBC has shown live Premier League matches, and the first time the broadcaster has shown any live top flight non cup football since 1988.

There is going to be virtually non stop wall to wall coverage of games, it will be interesting to see just how Amazon approach the broadcast of their games and if they continue to use the innovative methodology they employed the first time they broadcast during the New Year. - Ed

Share

Shameless 'Guidance' From Sullivan's Pets

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Wed, 03/06/2020 - 12:18

In a quite shameless attempt at 'nudging' season ticket holders towards NOT seeking refunds, the Hammers hierarchy via their 'unofficial' web portal have championed the benefit of leaving the monies due as refunds with the club to 'help it through the bad times'.

In an article posted on the 3rd of June the subterfuge goes........."Irons season ticket refund now? Not for me, the club has made it clear (sic) there are two options available on monies owed to season ticket holders with 5/19ths being repayable via a refund or by leaving it in our accounts to be deducted off the next full season. Given this was money I never expected to receive when I bought my season ticket I’ll be leaving the outstanding dough where it is and if that helps the club fair enough." Painfully, like a little child who has lied but then digs themselves deeper by more lies in the hope of not being found out, the 'article' continues with, "This isn’t about supporting Gold and Sullivan but the club and in the current circumstances I find it hard to see an alternative. I just feel It would be hypocritical to have asked others to do what I’m not prepared to do myself which in two words amounts to “HELP OUT.” Cash flow is important in these times and I don’t see any point in asking for a refund when it can be used for the next full season anyway.

Strangely enough, most Hammers fans love the club, it is in their blood and of course they want to see the club survive and heaven help even prosper, they do not need to be led like sheep and are perfectly capable of making the correct decisions without the 'voice of big brother' telling them what to do. The general consensus is that fans will be glad to leave their remaining monies with the club, it is just a pity that the club's powers that be felt it was necessary to sink to such propaganda supposedly generated by fans in order to achieve that which was already attainable, what will be of much more relevance will be what the plans are for the 'next' season with regards to season ticket renewals.

By electing to leave their money with the club, season ticket holders will be helping out, and most will do so willingly, however the Elephant in the room is match day attendance. Unless a miraculous cure for Covid-19 can suddenly be rolled out, football, or at least the live viewing of it as we knew it, will have changed completely and inexorably for potentially years. It is a point we have raised before, but why would anyone want to pay a year's season ticket to NOT be able to attend games? It makes absolutely no sense, the only compensation, although it is a case of schadenfreude is that Hammers will be hit less hard than others by the loss of match day revenue, and also despite having around 55,000 season ticket holders, the income derived is a fraction of that once received by other clubs.

Hammers' season ticket base comprises of around 14% Under 16's, 24% Under 18's and 18% Over 65's, all of which pay concessionary rates, so essentially over half of the season tickets are sold for approximately 'just' £9,000,000 per year, or the equivalent to about double Jack Wilshere's wages for the year!

A bit of truth can go a long long way, we know this site, like many others, is regularly 'trolled' by various 'divisions' of the West Ham United hierarchy, so please take note, treat adults like children and they will 'play up', treat them with respect and they will play the difficulties down. - Ed

Share

Hammers Just Like Ryanair For Refunds

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Tue, 02/06/2020 - 11:34

West Ham United season ticket holders have finally been given the 'options' with regards to what can happen to their remaining tickets for matches that they will be unable to attend. We say options but actually the first option has been taken for fans, by the club! ST holders will by now have received an e-mail setting out the club's refund policy, and it isn't quite as straight forward as fans have been led to believe. Here is an example, the details of which are a confusing to say the least and most definitely ambiguous.

"We have now applied a credit of £xxx.xx to your Club Cash account - Client reference number 9***** - for the pro-rata value of the Season Tickets you held for the remaining five home fixtures of 2019-2020 HOW CAN I USE MY CLUB CASH?"

We understand that many Season Ticket Holders will be missing the football, their matchday ritual and cheering on the Hammers in person, and may want to use their credit towards their next Season Tickets. Rest assured you can do exactly this. You don’t need to take any further action and your Club Cash amount will be held securely so that you can redeem it against the cost of your 2020-21 renewal. Opting to take a credit is an easy and convenient way for Season Ticket Holders to instantly guarantee their seat for next season without having to wait for the renewal period, with all supporters benefiting from the price freeze that has been confirmed for 2020-21 Season Tickets*, as well as, of course, helping to support the Club through these testing times.

*Season Ticket price freeze applies to all Season Ticket holders renewing for 2020-21 and is based on the Club retaining its Premier League status for the 2020-21 campaign. Season Ticket prices for 2020-21 will be announced at the appropriate time, with prices adjusted accordingly should any fixtures be played without supporters present.

Couple of confusing issues here, how much if any discount will be applied for 'next season's' games without crowds? Will the discount be pro rata if only 10% of fans are allowed to attend games at the Bowl of Misery, would that mean a discount of 90%? And finally the next line is 'amusing' because the initial choice has already been made in your absence, and as anyone who has ever tried to call the club's 'hotline' which is akin if not worse than Ryan Air's will tell you,"good luck on that one, best have a book and a flask of tea!".
'If you would prefer your credit as a refund then please call the Ticket Office on 0333 030 1966. Phone lines will be open 9am - 5pm, Monday to Friday.'

So, to encapsulate the renewal situation, those who know 'better' than yourself have decided to 'roll on' your money towards a season ticket that may be of no value whatsoever...there's nothing like Public Relations is there? - Ed

Share

Club Anthems To Be Used To Cover Silence

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Mon, 01/06/2020 - 11:31

Contrary to reports in some of the tabloids, the Barclays Premier League have NOT yet decided to use generic sound from FIFA console games for 'live' broadcasts, the option is under consideration but there are other options being explored. The idea of 'piped' crowd noise doesn't really appeal to the majority of stakeholders, however one idea doing the rounds is for teams to have their songs played during the games.

The idea is not as silly as it first sounds, because as anyone who has attended the bowl of misery will testify, more often than not it is the away fans who are most vocal, the same applies when West Ham are the visitors, time and again you hear 'Bubbles' being sung louder than the home fans' songs. Having worked in the Audio and Tech industries for over 40 years I know the algorythmic systems are easily available to 'sympathetically' add noise, there would be the use of generic noise but only in the back ground with the main 'noise' coming from drip fed club anthems.

To run a system that works requires only a couple of extra techicians, obviously they would have to be schooled as to when and how to use the crowds singing, but OPTA people are able to 'simucast' live games so why not others? Of course the solution is not perfect, but it is a lot better than just FIFA generic noise or worse still the sound ob a ball being kicked in an empty stadium that resonates accentuating just how sparse the crowd is. By playing the generic crowd noise and anthems out in to the Stadiums rather than just adding them to the broadcast outputs, it would create a similar situation to Amazon's unique attitude towards broadcasting where they offered the viewer the option to hear different commentaries or even none at all.

One key advantage we can see in using FIFA back ground sound is that, in the past it seems that playing FIFA is something Hammers players do an awful lot of, and maybe, just maybe, they will be playing in circumstances that they are more used to! - Ed

Share

A Season Ticket To Watch TV?

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Sat, 30/05/2020 - 11:21

Now that the Barclays Premier League's much touted 'Project Restart' has been agreed, the situation has more questions than answers when it comes to the practicality of hosting games and the further far reaching consequences of playing them behind closed doors.

West Ham United are due to contact all season ticket holders early next week with regards to potential refunds for the remaining five games that would have been played had it not been for the Covid-19 Pandemic, there is a suggestion that like several other clubs, the Irons will offer to let the remaining 'credit' roll over towards next season's season ticket renewal, by doing so the season ticket holder is guaranteed to renew at the original price.

On the face of it there seems nothing untoward, however there are no actual guarantees that games will be able to be played next season in front of crowds, and until there is an inoculation available the best that can be hoped for is a 10% attendance selected by ballot from season ticket holders. So what happens to the other 90%? This potentially difficult situation is just as much of a conundrum to clubs as it is to their fans, there are probably not many season ticket holders who are prepared to renew without knowing how many games they might see, especially if the 10% social distancing ruling is adhered to, even if the ratio is upped to 20% that would still leave the vast majority of fans unable to attend more than four home games per season!

How much are four games worth? It could be argued that some match day tickets for grade one games sold via ticket exchange go for serious money, as much as £60 for one game, but even using that figure we are only talking about £240 worth of expensive football. Something, somehow has to give, in the short term lavish signings will dry up for all but the 'elite' clubs that are financed by Sovereign States, and although clubs don't rely on gate revenue, no one knows if the viewing status quo can be sustained. The global love for the Barclays Premier League is based on the cut and thrust, speed and sheer physicality of the games accompanied by generally raucous and noisy crowds, recent experiences of the Bundesliga have shown just how sterile and uninspiring matches can be without crowds, will there still be such an appetite for the games without crowds?

It will be illuminating to see how West Ham manage a vast array of difficulties over the next couple of months, firstly there is the small matter of trying to stay in the top flight, which is by no means a small achievement at any time. The club will know the picture more clearly following Aston Villa's game in hand that they against Sheffield United, the result of which will give David Moyes a more accurate view of the task ahead of him. Secondly having found out which division the club will be playing in next season, there will be the complex matter of how much, if anything fans will be prepared to watch games that have extremely restricted crowds or games being played completely behind doors.

In order to watch games on Sky and BT Sport fans have to pay a subscription, so why would people want to pay their subscriptions and also a subscription to watch a team they cannot see live? Talk of 'rolling on' credits for the remaining five games towards next season's ticket renewal seem a bit premature because no one knows how the situation will develop, and unless guarantees of safety are in place there is little likelyhood of main stream football as we know it returning for some considerable time, so why would anyone want to pay for a season ticket?

With the exception of Newcastle United, no other club in the Barclays Premier League have 'taken' standing order payments for next season, and realistically how can they? Until there is a clearer picture it will be a case of 'watch this space', unfortunately 'this space' will probably relate to the size of the TV you are watching on instead of attending live games. Charging season ticket holders for games they cannot see, surely even David Sullivan couldn't get away that one could he?- Ed

With the exception of Newcastle United, no other club in the Barclays Premier League have 'taken' standing order payments for next season, and realistically how can they? Until there is a clearer picture it will be a case of 'watch this space', unfortunately 'this space' will probably relate to the size of the TV you are watching on instead of attending live games. Charging season ticket holders for games they cannot see, surely even David Sullivan couldn't get away that one could he?- Ed

Share

Report 3 In 3 Out For Moyes

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Wed, 27/05/2020 - 12:18

Even before the unique situation the Barclays Premier League finds itself in, Hammers manager David Moyes had been quoted as saying it was his intention to bring the average age of his squad down 'substantially', and for that purpose the search begins at home. Lacking the funds that were lavished on his predecessor Manuel Pellegrini, Moyes has either to look out for 'bargains' or promote from within, the latter being the preferred option.

Although Moyes is in the unfortunate position of having little or no money, unless via player sales, he does have a stellar selection of young talent available to him, and it should be noted that the current crop are really good and not just distant hopes as has been the case in recent years. Grady Diangana and Ben Johnson have been 'earmarked' to play an active role in the first team, by including them the average age of the first team would come down considerably for starters, in addition there is the Jeremy Ngakia situation to negotiate, he is a great talent as he was able to show just before the season was suspended.

The blot on the landscape however is that Ngakia is out of contract at the end of June, both he and his agent have rejected out of hand the club's standard contract offered to players moving off apprentice terms, believed to be around £3000 per week. West Ham are in danger of losing a valuable asset as a result of 'Oxforditis', a well known condition caused by giving a young talented player a fat contract at an early stage in their career. The once bitten twice shy element is that although Reece Oxford didn't live up to the hype and justify his £20,000 per week wages, one of his contemporaries, Declan Rice did, and what a player he has become.

As with Rice, the club were reluctant to hand out a similar contract to that which they gave Oxford, but a compromise was reached. Apparently Ngakia's representatives are looking for wage parity with Rice, and that isn't going to happen, however it appears that the club may 'box clever' by offering a deal that has incremental payment increases should Jeremy progress to the level that is anticipated both by the club and the player's agents. This resolution, should it happen, would suit all parties and ensure that no one loses face over what should really have been a side issue, but the club can't afford to lose such a talent as a result of past experiences or as an act of brinkmanship!

Should David Moyes get his wish, who would make way for the trio of youngsters from the first team's previous evolution? Johnson and Ngakia are full backs by trade and if there ever was an area that needed strengthening and scrutiny it is in defence, Pablo Zabaleta's contract expires at the end of the season leaving just the injury prone and unpredictable Ryan Fredericks at right back. At left back Aaron Cresswell is no spring chicken, despite his youthful looks he is over 30 years old now, and his 'back up' is Authur Masuaku, a player capable of being inspiring and truly awful in equal measure during the same game, he is neither a full back nor a winger and is a 'luxury' player Moyes cannot afford to countenance.

On the face of it Authur Masuaku's days are most definitely numbered, especially given the noises emerging from Rush Green that David Moyes "cannot trust Masuaku" and that the player has "regressed in the last twelve months". So with the full backs covered the next area of concern is the midfield, the defensive side is covered by Rice and hopefully Tomas Soucek who has already shown what an important player for the club he will be in the future, so long as it stays in the upper tier. If David Moyes does want to include Grady Diangana in the first team, who would make way?

Something has to give, although it could be argued that given West Ham United players' propensity for picking up long term injuries that there is a need for at least two players in each position! Diangana plays in the same position as Manuel Lanzini, Pablo Fornals and Felipe Anderson, so there is a distinct likelyhood that one of those three may well be leaving the club, Diangana can also play in the same zone as Yarmolenko, a player who was signed on huge wages despite having a poor injury record, and of course Grady can also play in the same position as Jack Wilshere, a player who needs no introduction.

Suffice to say the Hammers hierarchy are desperate to lose Wilshere, Yarmolenko and that old 'stalwart' Carlos Sanchez as well as 'Radio Gaga' Roberto, if, and it is a big if, they can be offloaded it will release around £15 Million in wages per annum. Money that could be used to offset the pandemic losses which are bound to occur, but also to ensure the club's future by holding on to it's assets of which Ngakia is one, the club don't have to be stupid by biting of their nose to spite their face in order to avoid another Reece Oxford situation, but they also need to strike the correct balance.

With a bit of luck David Moyes will actually be able to select a team that he is proud of, and one that he has helped develop and recruit, the first issue will be how to fit the best players into the same team. The 'new look' line up might be ......
Fabianski, Ngakia, Diop, Ogbonna, Johnson, Rice, Soucek/Noble, Diangana, Bowen, Fornals, Haller, the 'B' team wouldn't be too bad either......
Randolph, Fredericks, Balbuena, Cardosa, Cresswell, Anderson, Lanzini, Snodgrass, Silva, Masuaku, Antonio. Got a better selection? Feel free to post it! -Ed

Share

London's Top 'Neutral' Venue Is The LS

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Tue, 26/05/2020 - 12:30

Who'd have 'thunk' it, the much maligned London Stadium may well become the visual template for behind closed door matches being played to complete the 2019-2020 Barclays Premier League season, with a requisite for venues to be away from densely populated areas but with ample provision for public access. Brighton – Amex Stadium. Southampton – St Mary's Stadium. Leicester – King Power Stadium. Aston Villa – Villa Park. Manchester United – Old Trafford.
Manchester City – Etihad and possibly Arsenal – Emirates although there are particular transport issues that would need to be resolved for the North London stadium.

Some might say that for the Irons it is a situation that gives the club significant advantages, but seeing that five of the nine remaining matches were due to be played at home anyway that advantage is diminished, especially bearing in mind the toxic atmosphere that was present from the home crowd at the London Stadium for most matches.

Playing behind closed doors in the 2nd biggest stadium in England will take some getting used to, with Stadia like the Amex being viewed far more favourably due to their relatively small capacity. Anyone who has been watching the Bundesliga's tentative season restart will tell you that some teams have adapted really well and others haven't. Interestingly with games being played on a home and away basis, it is the away teams who seem to have emerged successfully because there is less of an onus on them to perform well thus freeing them up to play with 'expression'.

Perhaps David Moyes will manage to instill the need for 'expressiveness' in his squad, they have to hit the ground running, but a couple of wins and everyone will be looking forward to when 'real' football starts again, if things don't go so well that will be another story, but until then there is still an awful lot of hope that the club retains it's premier league status, especially if the youth policy is adhered to. - Ed

Share

LS Tenancy Could Save Irons

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Sun, 24/05/2020 - 13:11

The long term financial implications for the Barclays Premier League due to the Covid-19 pandemic are almost impossible to assess, because as yet no one knows when or even if an innoculation against this dreadful disease will be available, without which there will be NO supporters at football matches for some considerable time, many months, possibly years!

The decision to leave the much loved Boleyn Ground has rankled huge traits of the Irons fan base, but slowly the 'White Elephant' that is the London Stadium started to feel more like a football ground as opposed to an athletics stadium. The transition was to be enhanced by the 'squaring off' of the pitch behind each goal area to bring the fans closer to the pitch, that has obviously been put on hold for the time being.

There isn't one Premier League club that actually relies on gate income as the club's main source of income, gate receipts and catering profits being considered as the 'icing on the cake', the huge TV revenues are what clubs need to prosper and rely upon. If and when spectators are allowed to return there is a very likely prospect that only one in ten supporters will actually be allowed in to games initially. We have seen a draft document detailing exactly how the return of 'crowds' is being envisaged, season ticket holders would only be allowed to attend matches where social distancing can be maintained, for the London Stadium this would mean a total capacity of around 6000 fans.

While clubs will still receive TV money, the exact amount is unclear because no one has the data available as to how many subscribers around the World want to see games played in virtual silence. If the Bundesliga re-start is anything to go by then there will be significant numbers of people electing not to watch the 'sterile' games.

So the bean counters at clubs are trying to calculate the best business plan to move forward, the primary details of any business restart are to cut costs, to cut their cloth according to their respective incomes. Despite the huge amount of TV money clubs receive, there are those who rely on gate revenues for their Stadia more than others, despised local rivals Tottenham Hotspur appear to be hardest hit on account of the fact that their 'new' stadium was massively delayed due to unforeseen engineering difficulties and Government red tape, the club were relying on Baseball and American football fixtures to help pay off the vast amount of money required for the stadium's construction.

Being saddled with the cost of the new stadium during this pandemic is probably the manifestation of Daniel Levy's worst nightmare, the loan repayments and running costs don't go away just because the stadium is not in use. For once a West Ham United mistake, and there have been many many of them in the past, might have unintentionally protected the very existence of the club, as the Irons are only 'anchor' tenants at the London Stadium, the vast majority of the day to day running costs are paid by the LDDC which of course means the tax payer at the end of the day.

Irrespective of the moral aspect, the actuality is that West Ham should be able to 'ride out the storm' with less collateral damage than other clubs because of the low cost of being anchor tenants, in fact there is a strong possibility that if David Sullivan looks down the back of his Theydon Bois sofa he might be able to pick up a couple of bargains from clubs less well financed. Who Knows, what started out as an embarrassing dead weight might yet turn out to be the club's salvation. -Ed

Share

My Dear Old Mum

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Tue, 19/05/2020 - 21:14

My Dear Old Mum Joyce Ann Beryl Nixon died the other day at the age of 87, she had a good innings and is now in a better place, she was blown out of London , literally, during the Blitz. She was an absolutely ardent, some might say possessed Hammers fan her whole life, who regularly spoke with David Gold because they went to the same school, and although in her latter years she would make an awful lot of phone calls, day and night regardless, she always knew no matter what NOT to call for at least 12 hours if the Irons had just got beaten. God bless her, she was a trouper and a warrior, a tour de force...I had better warn my Dad to turn down his hearing aid! J.A.B Nixon 1933-20120 RIP x

Rice's Parting Gift Can Be European Football

Submitted by Akira Andersson on Tue, 19/05/2020 - 11:46


There’s been a lot of speculation over the last year or so about Declan Rice moving on to pastures new, and those rumours have gathered pace in the last couple of weeks in the tabloids and on social media. £70m is the fee being touted. Is it enough? And if he does go, where does that leave West Ham and their midfield?

Where Could Declan End Up?
Chelsea are leading the way for the 21-year-old’s signature if the rumours are to be believed. He’s priced up at around 5/6 with a few bookies to be a Blues player by the end of the summer transfer window, which suggests it could happen. You can bet online on UK football at many great sports betting sites using your phone or laptop, whichever suits you best. But those odds of 5/6 might not last for too long if the rumours build! So don’t think about it too much.

There’s no smoke without fire is there?

Let’s also not forget that he was at Chelsea before he signed for West Ham! So he knows the place very well already. Not only that but his best friend is none other than Chelsea youngster Mason Mount. It seems like the script is already written.

Manchester United are another club who are rumoured to be sniffing around the young England international. But at £70m, is it a price that might put potential buyers off? Or is it a bargain? Nobody really knows how the market is going to change once football is back to normal, but a lot of pundits are expecting transfer fees to fall, which makes the £70m seem less likely. But if anyone can tempt Rice to move, it’s his best mate Mount.

One More Year
Declan Rice has a contract with West Ham until the end of the 2023-24 season, so there’s no need for Hammers fans to panic about losing him on the cheap. That’s not going to happen. What is slightly worrying, though, is the tabloids mentioning the need for the owners to recoup some of the money they will have lost during lockdown. That £70m then becomes a lot more attractive to Gold and Sullivan.

If West Ham can keep hold of Rice for one more season, it gives them a great chance of a solid push for European football next year. That would be great. Thanks very much Declan, you’ve got the club into Europe, you can now enjoy a dream move. Football works in strange ways sometimes, though, so nobody’s ever sure what might happen. Especially with agents and transfers.

If Rice chooses to stay, he would no doubt be worshipped by the fans for many years to come. Just look at Mark Noble as a prime example. But let’s be honest; Declan is a lot better than Nobes. You cannot begrudge him a move to a bigger club, but all West Ham fans will be hoping he gives them at least one more year to ply his trade.

Who Can Replace Rice in the Centre?
Mark Noble doesn’t have too much left in him in terms of playing 90mins week in, week out, so it’s likely David Moyes will need to find two central midfielders if Rice goes. Some of the potential transfer fee can be used to bring in a replacement, but what about Jack Wilshere? Rice has already said himself that Wilshere is ridiculous in training and possesses incredible ability. If the midfield maestro can fight off his demons and get back to full fitness, West Ham
might not need to dip into the market for a new midfielder. West Ham fans reading that last sentence will be shaking their head already. There’s no chance he’s ever going to be back fully fit for a prolonged period of time is there? What a shame.

Decision Time
Declan Rice is concentrating on his football at the moment, as all professional footballers should. But he may have already made his mind up regardless of what happens for the rest of this season. If the fixtures resume and West Ham go down, that’s the decision made for him anyway. Not to mention the cut price bargain Chelsea may end up with by effectively signing a Championship player.

But let’s not get too ahead of ourselves. The Hammers are very much still a Premier League club at the moment. Declan Rice has some big decisions to make before the start of next season, but I expect his choice will also hinge on the ambition David Moyes and the owners show in the transfer market ahead of the next campaign. He won’t want another relegation dogfight. If he does leave, he won’t fall into the Jermain Defoe category that’s for sure. If he stays, let’s
hope we’re all going on a European tour in 2021!

Share

Pages

Next Fixture(s)

Subscribe to Forum | General Discussion