You are here

Forum | General Discussion

Sue the FA

Stevey shep's picture
Submitted by Stevey shep on Mon, 04/04/2016 - 08:34

So after being sued by just about everyone. Tevezgate stadiumgate etc etc.
it's about fookin time we sued those clints down at the FA. I'm getting extremely bitter at everything they do at the moment. Especially as we seem to be targeted with horrible disgusting life changing decisions.
Third referee arguments etc are invalid. Because it doesn't help us now! We could potentially be top3 as it was without the referees involvement and we'd be in a semi final.
So I say lets sue the fookers. For lost prize money. Damages and the general nice feeling we'd get as fans for 'doing the FA over'
Referees not being allowed to be criticised etc is disgusting. Yes they make mistakes but if they apologised for it or were publicly punished it probably wouldn't be so bad, we could see that it's acknowledged they fooked up and we'd have that little bit of retribution knowing they had been punished.
So the the FA which at this moment in time stands for F**K ALL get there fingers out of the big4's assholes we might actually stand a chance.
If there's a contentious decision against us in the replay. Storm the pitch and lynch the refs. Hopefully from now until the end of the season people will realise us west ham fans are becoming mutinous and they award us a penalty every game to appease us.
So in summary sue the chunts and forget being PC let's have the fines and have bilic, players owners fans. Tell the FA what we think.
Cheating clints.

Hammers Champions League Hopes Clattered By Ref Again!

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Sun, 03/04/2016 - 10:10
plonker

For the fourth game in a row West Ham have been denied the success they deserved by dubious refereeing decisions, on this occasion step forward Mark Clattenburg in the starring role. Clattenburg and his colleagues have given conspiracy theorists a field day by their seemingly insistent desire to prevent Hammers 'sneaking' in to the remaining Champions League slot, after all the powers that be are already incredibly uncomfortable with Leicester City's current lofty position, one set of upstarts is enough, therefore don't expect Slaven Billic's team to be given any breaks, starting with Cheik Kayoute's red card appeal! Generally one would expect the appeal to be successful, Kayoute's foot was in the air, but only one foot and the tackle was in no way malicious, more the result of someone who was a little tired having just travelled half way round the world on International duty.
Slaven Bilic said: "I want to commend the players it was a good game of football, open, and we deserved to win. "When it was 11 v 11 the scoreline was correct. They caused us a threat, but only at set pieces,then we turned it around." On the decision to send off Kouyate, Bilic added:"I would love to say a lot of things. I asked the legal people what can I say and what I can't. It is never a red card and it's the fourth game in a row we are getting decisions that are costing us. "We're fighting to finish high. If the opponent is better than you, ok, but it is frustrating. We aren't going to sink or moan - we will come back and continue to play good football. "Crystal Palace boss Alan Pardew admitted that he did not agree with Mark Clattenburg's decision to send off Kouyate. "I thought the red card was harsh and I would've been disappointed to have that happen to one of my players," said Pardew. "When you are 2-1 down at West Ham, in the form they are in, you take a 2-2. I'm delighted for the team and they showed their heart is still very much in it. We've got ourselves into a bit of trouble but this is a great result. "Every point in the Premier League is gold-dust, especially to get something at West Ham. It was a great performance and a great result. West Ham had to defend for their lives at the end."
Before Kouyate's sending off, West Ham had looked well-placed to claim the three points. Despite falling behind in the 15th minute, they were only in arrears for three minutes before Diafra Sakho headed down Michail Antonio's cross and Lanzini drilled his low effort home. However for home fans and neutrals alike, the moment of the match, once again, came from the boot of Dimitri Payet, whose curling, dipping 20-yard free kick put Hammers ahead just before half time. It was his 12th goal of the season and he has also been directly involved in 23 goals in all competitions, 13 more than any other West Ham player. If Hammers do miss out on Champions League qualification, which is looking increasingly likely, then they will face a battle to keep hold of the France midfielder, who is going to be among the contenders for the Barclays Premier League's Player of the Year award. PSG, with their vast financial muscle, in particular! - Ed

Share

Four Points, Two Games, One Champions League Place

asheshammer's picture
Submitted by asheshammer on Sun, 03/04/2016 - 00:38

Robbed twice in two Premier League matches, we could be in 4th place on 55 points, +14 GD, and reasonably clear of 6th place. Instead, we will lucky not to be sat 6th after the referees do their "work" at Old Trafford today. I'm struggling to come up with reasons why this is happening to us on such a regular basis: how many red cards already rescinded (too late) this season for West Ham? How many penalties not given? How many serious fouls against us unpunished? Is it the big money generally, and the threat West Ham pose of cracking into the Big Time? Is it specifically the big money invested in Man City? Is it that none of the teams up North would be in a Champions League Place if we were in 4th? Is it fear that England could lose CL places if teams like Leicester and West Ham failed to perform in the CL? Is it all of the above? Or do we just happen to have gotten the wrong end of the decisions time and time and time again, pure bad luck? For myself, I think it is that the global brand of Manchester United is just too big, and some people will do ANYTHING to make sure that they qualify for the Champions League. Well, we will see. Bring on the big boys. We have Arsenal and Manure at home. Let's see them try to walk over us. IRONS!

It all evens itself out during the season

Submitted by Red Neck Iron on Sat, 02/04/2016 - 23:45

Well you often hear it from the so called big clubs that things even themselves out over a season, personally I never have believed it as a fan from a team outside the usual suspects. Well if anyone is believe it is true we only have a few games left and during these games that have been denied Us through refereeing incompetence, we are gona be going on a red hot streak no one can touch! Of course I could be right and it's just a load of smoke and mirrors to deflect the favouritism from certain clubs. From now until the season end who will get more rub of the green West Ham or Man Utd? If the saying is true we should breeze it somehow I think it just ain't gona happen.

West Ham United v Crystal Palace FC Team Sheets And Links

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Sat, 02/04/2016 - 14:05

West Ham : Adrian, Antonio, Reid, Ogbonna, Cresswell, Noble (c), Kouyate, Emenike, Lanzini, Payet, Sakho
Substitutes: Randolph (GK), Song, Tomkins, Carroll, Valencia, Obiang, Moses
Crystal Palace: Hennessey; Ward, Dann, Delaney, Souare; Zaha, Puncheon, Jedinak, Ledley, Sako; Bolasie.
Substitutes: McCarthy, Mariappa, Kelly, Mutch, Lee, Gayle, Campbell.

Share

Who do you think should play right back today?

Submitted by Red Neck Iron on Sat, 02/04/2016 - 12:09

Well it sounds like we may have a dilemma at right back today! Options! We have Antonio currently at right back, in your opinion do we need him more in midfield? Do we play o Brian as he is probably match fit now, do we take a risk with Tomkins match fitness and play him or do we play 3 at the back and Antonio and cresswell as wing backs? Personally I really think it might be a good idea to have the wing backs. Palace are quite strong on the flanks which would help nullify this threat whilst keeping our strengths going forward. What do you think?

The back to the real football, quiz.

Submitted by Red Neck Iron on Sat, 02/04/2016 - 10:10

Q1. West Ham beat bury 10-0 in the milk cup, who was the striker that failed to get his name on the score sheet?

Q2. Who refereed the first half of mark nobles testimonial match?

Q3. Which former hammer has a son playing in goal in the championship?

Q4. What was Bobby Moores last game for West Ham ?

Q5. Which player made his debut upfront for West Ham in 1995?

Special question six. Name the 11 scorers in mark nobles testimonial

Arsenal Look To Payet As No 1 Target To Replace Mesut Özil

nevillenixon's picture
Submitted by nevillenixon on Fri, 01/04/2016 - 11:30

Arsene Wenger is lining up a huge £45 Million offer to take Dimitri Payet from West Ham to Arsenal, Wenger is hoping his 'french connection' will help swing the deal in his favour. The Arsenal manager is being forced into opening talks early because his main play maker Mesut Özil has been courted by Real Madrid and a £65 Million pre-transfer deal is already in place with the Spanish giants who see Özil as their next Gallactico signing, for some reason it is enshrined in their culture that they must sign one Gallactico every year, irrespective of whether the player really wants to move there or not!
Now £45 Million may seem like an awful lot of money for a 29 year old attacking mid fielder, but West Ham are rumoured ti have already turned down £38 Million from an as yet unnamed Chinese side, so Arsenal's offer is only £7 Million more, why would the Hammers co-owners cash in on the player they purchased for £10.5 Million in the summer, to make a quick £35 Million?
Either way, West Ham fans will be furious that they won't be able to sing their "we've got Payet" song anymore, after all, he is their No 1 player! Not really fond of fans No 1 in the past. - Ed

Share

Pages

Next Fixture(s)

Subscribe to Forum | General Discussion