You are here

Forum | General Discussion

Hammers Set To Sign Defender Nicknamed Axel ‘Disaster’

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Fri, 30/01/2026 - 09:42

The Hammers have set their eyes on an array of different defenders throughout this window, and it appears we’ve aimed the bow at one individual, yet the arrow doesn’t seem to be very straightforward.

The Hammers have found their target, yet aren’t ready to fully commit. It appears at this moment in time that the deal will be concluded after the Chelsea game, which would be just two days before the Transfer window closes, it feels as if the Hammers only like to go for previous targets! The club have been knocking on Disasi’s door for numerous windows now and finally it seems like it’ll be across the line, unless Nuno and the club end up with cold feet.

A rather successful Aston Villa spell Axel Disasi had, but since returning to Chelsea, the 27 year old has been unable to receive any significant gametime and upon rejecting our Summer loan offer, it would result in him playing for Chelsea’s U21s. To make matters worse, whilst he was playing for the Chelsea first team squad, he was nicknamed Axel ‘Disaster’, which is what all clubs admire to have a defender branded as. However, there have been plenty of defenders and players who have been labelled as destined flops and have been great for the Hammers, but this loan does ultimately scream desperate.

To be or not to be, Axel Dissatisfying or satisfactory is the question?

In an attempt to focus on the positives, Disasi was rather successful at Aston Villa and at Chelsea. Their defence isn’t good whether he is or isn’t playing, they’re prone to making mistakes and across his time, he ultimately could’ve ended up being the fall-guy who didn’t deserve it.

All will be revealed soon enough but that event will only occur if the Hammers choose to push onwards with the deal - LN

Share

Sullivan Sanctioned Lucas Paqueta's Move

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Thu, 29/01/2026 - 07:35

After what has felt like an eternity of a saga, Lucas Paqueta has officially left the Hammers in order to complete his move to Flamengo. The club managed to agree on a fee for €42,000,000, which isn’t only Flamingo’s record fee, but it’s the Brazilian league’s record.

The ongoing saga could’ve been completed at a much quicker rate than expected, in which a week ago the Hammers had actually accepted a lower offer with a lucrative payment schedule, but last minute, Flamengo pulled the offer and it triggered another week of negotiating, which is now finally over.

There were initially rumours that Paqueta would land in Brazil on Sunday, in which you would’ve then thought Sully’s gone on to SkyScanner to find the cheapest flight for Paqman, must’ve been a lot of flight stops!

Fortunately, the deal is finalised and 99% complete.

The club have also published a statement upon Paqueta’s departure, in which part of it saw the Hammers send a damming message towards the fans: “Despite the Club doing everything possible to persuade Lucas to stay, he has remained adamant that his wish is to leave. Therefore, the Head Coach and the Club have reluctantly agreed to accept his transfer request.”

This would go hand in hand with the fact that Nuno initially expected to retain Lucas Paqueta, and it must’ve come as a shock once he was told that he had to sell the Brazilian, in which there’s been no replacement in sight since. It looks unlikely that any signings of a midfielder will happen before now and the end of the window, with the primary goal being a central defender, but whether that’s on a permanent or a loan deal is the question to ponder upon.

Many won’t forget Lucas Paqueta’s first season at West Ham, but it’s crucial to remember that he’s not even half the player he used to be. Some will be upset at the fact he’s ’forced a move’, but the truth is, he was simply just a man who was torn limb from limb via the FA, and that has resulted in the demise of his career.

Thankfully, the situation didn’t turn ugly at any given moment, it was simply a case of tough negotiations. West Ham squeezed out any ounce of a fee we could get, and Paqueta has ended up happy. A win-win on the books, but whether that money will be reinvested remains unknown. - LN

Share

The Modern Game

Deluded Hammer's picture
Submitted by Deluded Hammer on Tue, 27/01/2026 - 13:03

Is it just me getting disillusioned with the game today. Back when I was growing up in the 60's watching the game it was so simple. There was no VAR, the offside rule simple and handball was handball, There was only one camera high up above the stands broadcasting, calm commentary from the likes of Brian Moore, Motson or Kenneth Wolstenholme dressed in sheepskins or heavy raincoats. Not a hint of some squeaky voiced dolly bird dressed in the latest fashion nodding furiously at every comment made by those who knew what they were talking about.
, The referees decision was final and the linesman generally so. Goalkeepers caught the ball and also took goal kicks unless injured. Players went down only if they had a broken leg and any other injury play was waved on until it went out of play. The object of the game was to score more goals than the opposition, none of this sideways, sideways, sideways and back, before sideways. sideways again. I remember the boos and the slow handclaps if they dared pass back to the keeper in those days.
And then there is the allure of the players themselves. Never mind the allure of going to the games to watch our own players, Bobby Moore, Geoff Hurst, Billy Bonds or Trevor Brooking, I would go to games to see the oppositions special attractions, The Stan Bowles, Rodney Marshes or the George Bests and Bobby Charltone. Even the lower teams like Spurs had their Jimmy Greaves, Burnley's Ralph Coates, or Leicester Citys Frank Worthington. Even goalkeepers would get me out on a freezing snow driven day like Pat Jennings, Gordon Banks or Peter Shilton. So many names from nearly all teams but there isn't a single Premier League player that would tempt me to part with my hard earned today.
Of course, I can't stop whinging without a mention to the sterilised grounds of today. The day the demolition of the Twin Towers of Wembley was the start of the rot in my opinion. Highbury, The original Den of Millwall, White Hart Lane and of course our own Boleyn Ground. Gone are the roasted peanuts, hot chestnuts braziers, burgers dripping in greasy fat and onions and the spit and sawdust pubs of the day. I won't mention the price match tickets these days. Corporate Hospitality? That was for those who had a seat wasn't it?
Anyone feel the same?

Hammers Hokey Pokey - South American Transfer Edition

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Tue, 27/01/2026 - 08:29

Two in, three out! It’s all in & out for the Hammers at the moment during this January window in what has been one of the most active January’s in a very long time.

The Hammers have so far seen Taty and Pablo introduced to West Ham, but out the door have gone Guilherme, Guido Rodriguez, and soon-to-be Lucas Paqueta. Guido has officially left the Hammers after joining Valencia for an ‘undisclosed fee’, which is under £500,000, and it was completed in this sense rather than terminating his contract, as it benefited both sides.

West Ham will not be signing a midfielder this transfer window, despite all the blabbering rumours and ludicrous suggestions. The focus is now towards signing a goalkeeper and a central defender, otherwise, no one else will be signed by the club.

The Paqman saga is coming to a close as his move to Flamengo is the closest it has been since it began, the fee is finally no longer an issue, and the Brazilian side is expected to pay £36,000,000 for Lucas Paqueta, where it’s about ironing out the finer details rather than a fee at this moment in time, which had been the initial problem this entire window. West Ham initially asked for Lucas Paqueta to be sent back on loan for the remainder of the season, but Nuno decided against what he initially requested to Flamengo and accepted that Lucas simply no longer wants to stay in England, which is reinforced by the fact that he outright rejected offers from both Spurs and Chelsea.

The deal for Lucas Paqueta to Flamengo could be finalised as early as today, but that depends on Flamengo and their willingness to provide sulky Sul a better payment method.

Conveniently, this hokey pokey saga actually meant for a few days, West Ham had 6 South American players at the club at once which is the highest the Hammers have had in their history… enough with the circus stats, back to business Hammers! - LN

Share

Paco Jemez - Hammers’ Newest Nutter

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Mon, 26/01/2026 - 07:52

Paco Jemez - An individual who spent his entire career in Spain, yet always seemed destined to join the East London side, given his character.

A perfect fit for West Ham at the moment, given his tactical style but he also embodies what fans admire to have. Against Sunderland, it was noticed that as per, across the goals, Jemez would celebrate like normal, yet towards the end of the game, specifically where Nuno was going to substitute on Max Kilman, he began raging towards the head coach about his decision and believed that there was no need to substitute on a defender.

Paco spoke out to a Spanish news channel after the match, claiming “the change wasn't bad, but I would do it for someone else or not” - A fair yet damning statement, clear to see who he isn’t a fan of, that’s for sure!

Given how Paco is on the sidelines, you can only begin to imagine how he is in training, does he get annoyed at the players and begin to play himself? Or does he thump someone to the floor to explain to the boys how to tackle? He’s exactly what West Ham have needed to rediscover after years of losing Stuart Pierce. Sometimes, managers need someone to go against their prophecy, as they can get stuck in their own heads and begin to spiral.

“He brought me to England, not to keep quiet, but to tell him what I think and to help him, above all to help him.” - Nuno needed help and there’s nothing wrong with that. He was alone on a plank of wood in the sea but at least now he has a few more planks with him.

Does Paco Jemez answer all of the questions that Hammers fans are asking, certainly not. But attempting to complete the Great Escape alone would be an accident waiting to happen, at least now, we stand a fighting chance.

A lot of work to be done in the one week we have remaining, I’m certain that whoever the Hammers bring in, if anyone, will be whipped into shape quickly through the newest nutter in town. - LN

Share

7 wins from safety

mcbikeman's picture
Submitted by mcbikeman on Sun, 25/01/2026 - 16:55

That is my opinion because i think it will take 40/41 points this time around to stay up so where do they come from?
home games against Wolves/Bournemouth/Everton are must wins...Arsenal/Citeh/Manure(revitalised)will be tough to get points out of those fixtures but maybe we could squeak two points leaving us to find ten more points from Palace/Brentford/Villa/Chelski/Barcodes/Bindippers/Fulham/Burnley away.....not easy but we have to beat Palace/Brentford/Burnley/Fulham to secure our future.

So three home wins and four away a very tough ask but that is for me what will be required...will the games pan out that way well common sense tells you it never does but i still say we need 21 more points to be safe and considering we only have 20 now well it will be the greatest escape ever considering thew board!

As for who we send down it would be lovely to see the spuds go but i have a sneaking feeling Palace are wobbling big time and it will be them not us COYI.

Irons Hold Their Own - West Ham 3-1 Sunderland

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Sat, 24/01/2026 - 15:38

Nuno’s side certainly don’t like making it easy for themselves, a dominant first half performance and the best one Hammers have seen in a while, Nuno’s side were nothing short of excellent, hard to pick out a negative!

Nuno’s attacking play since QPR has improved dramatically. We’ve gone all guns blazing, in which Taty and Pablo have added a significant amount of energy to this side, the Hammers have gone from having three shots per game to getting three goals, a significant improvement.

Despite Summerville’s excellence and Bowen’s precision from the penalty, Matheus Fernandes’ strike was one for the ages, a magnificent strike from 30 yards out dispatched into the top corner, one which even managed to get the entire of the London Stadium in shock.

As anticipated, after such a fairytale first half, Nuno’s side decided to shut up shop but managed to do it with miles more precision than previous efforts. His side reduced the number of bodies forward and held Sunderland to the midfield. A moment of lapse saw the Black Cats nick a goal, but the Hammers held their own, stood on two feet and wouldn’t concede again.

From the lineup to the starting squad, it was positive. Nuno made the right calls at the right time, which also helped the Hammers, but the relentless pressure at the beginning ultimately summoned Sunderland’s grave. It was identical to the Spurs’ first-half performance, but this time the Hammers were more clinical, which proved to be the difference.

Summerville is playing with more confidence, Bowen appears to be gelling with Taty, and Fernandes has found himself being a Duracell Bunny who can pick up the pieces when a problem arises, something West Ham have been crying out to have for years.

Three goals, three points and more positives than negatives, you certainly can’t complain, it’s the first time West Ham have won three competitive matches in a row since November 30th 2023… that sums it all up. - LN

The club remain in the relegation zone, but the gap has now closed to two points with Forest yet to play. Regardless of their result on Sunday, there are two handfuls of positives we can take from ours.

Share

West Ham vs Sunderland Line-ups:

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Sat, 24/01/2026 - 11:15

West Ham: Areola, Scarles, Todibo, Mavropanos, Wan-Bissaka, Fernandes, Soucek, Bowen (C), Taty, Summerville, Pablo
Subs: Hermansen, Ward-Prowse, Kilman, Diouf, Kante, Wilson, Magassa, Potts, Walker-Peters

Sunderland: Roefs, Mukiele, Ballard, Alderete, Reinaldo, Hume (C), Sadiki, Le Fee, Mundle, Mayenda, Brobbey
Subs: Paterson, O’Nien, Geertruida, Cirkin, Rigg, Diarra, Adingra, Isidor, Talbi

Share

The Torrid Truth Of Hammers’ January Spending

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Fri, 23/01/2026 - 09:51

It was anticipated by most that the Hammers would need a hefty window given the league position and the state of the club come the opening of January, in which, with the swift introductions of both Taty and Pablo, most believed we were in for a good window.

However, as time passes, it’s all become a farce seeing as now the Hammers can’t afford to spend anymore without any sales, which is odd considering on paper it seems that the board is prepared to sell a ‘key asset’ in order to facilitate rather than out of pocket funds.

Taty Castellenos cost West Ham £26,000,000, Pablo cost £21,000,000, and to be generous, our newest confirmed signing, Lamadrid cost £1,000,000. Though the figure for Lamdrid is a lot less, if we also presume that the signing of Adama Traore is completed, which has been rumoured for weeks, it feels that Fulham are asking £5,000,000 for him. Which means, in total, hypothetically and literally, the Hammers would’ve spent a total of £53,000,000 this transfer window, not bad right?

Luis Guilherme was sold for £13,000,000 excl Add-ons, Irving was sold for £1,500,000 and Paqueta is rumoured to be sold for £39,000,000, if not more! In which that totals to £53,500,000!

Forget the myth that West Ham have spent money this transfer window, we’ve made a profit whilst in a relegation battle. The concept of selling a player for the big bucks and reinvesting it in the squad makes sense, but given the position that the club currently find themselves in, it’s certainly astonishing that no money is being put towards new, bold signings that don’t come with the consequences of needing to sell.

The ‘profit margins’ indicate exactly as to why Nuno’s side have been linked to an array of dull, short-term centre defenders that would cost nothing more than a shilling and could perhaps get Nuno’s side over the line and into Premier League safety. This, of course, will only be possible with the help of some flying pigs over the Stadium on a matchday - LN

Share

Army of Age - Hammers Head For Leaders

Submitted by Louis Nixon on Wed, 21/01/2026 - 08:29

An eye for age? The Hammers certainly like the concept of signing a cheaper central defender this summer, and as time has passed, it has become blatantly obvious what the Hammers plan is for the remainder of the transfer window.

In search of a central defender to reinforce the backline, the Hammers have officially shortlisted Axel Disasi, Fabian Schar, Tyrone Mings and Victor Lindelof.

These are the domestic names of interest as the Hammers still remain keen on other international targets elsewhere, such as Charlie Cresswell, but it appears to be that every player the club attempts to move for is either too expensive or not to Nuno’s liking, which, in translation, indicates that the telephone lines are down between Nuno and the board or perhaps there’s a small aspect of miscommunication… wonder if it’ll be ironed out.

All of the listed names appear as a waiting list for the Saudi League, not another Premier League club! But the truth is West Ham’s options at the moment are dire, they’re nothing short of liabilities, and Nuno has inadvertently still been desperate to sign one, hence his comments after every match since the transfer window has opened, claiming that “we need to rebalance the squad”.

Rebalancing for purpose, or for the sake of making the fans happy, is the question to be answered at the moment. It has been confirmed that Nuno is delaying the process of signing a centre-back, but that is only because he isn’t happy with the options that have been provided towards him by the club’s chief scout and target provider, Agent DS.

With the exclusion of Charlie Cresswell, for whom Toulouse have rejected a €20,000,000 bid by German side Wolfsburg, the remaining targets are likely to cost around the £5,000,000 to £10,000,000 mark. A cheap price for a defender and little to no enthusiasm to fork out more funds, as it will break the imaginary money border that has been set.

Leadership is one factor, but being old, frail, or simply not good enough won’t provide the Hammers any benefit. It’s a huge risk with an old reward, sometimes old is gold, but that’s only in rare cases. - LN

Share

Pages

Next Fixture(s)

Subscribe to Forum | General Discussion